Overlays
The covered call trap: when selling upside on BTC reserves works against the treasury
· Michael Mescher, Gammon Capital
A covered call on BTC reserves generates premium income. In a flat or mildly declining market, the trade looks productive. The analysis that ends there is incomplete. A covered call is a sale of the upside optionality embedded in the reserve asset, which is often a material reason the treasury holds the asset at all. The regimes in which the trade makes sense are narrower than most desks represent.
What you are actually selling
A public-company BTC treasury holds BTC, at least in part, because the board believes the asset has asymmetric upside. A covered call converts that asymmetric position into a capped one above the strike. If BTC appreciates past the strike, the treasury delivers the asset (or cash-settles the difference) and participates only up to that level. The premium received does not compensate for the forgone upside if the underlying makes a large move.
At a 60% annualised realised vol, the probability of the underlying closing above a 120% strike in ninety days is not trivial. A treasury that captures a 2% premium and forgoes a 30% move has made a bad trade. The board that authorised holding BTC for its asymmetric upside did not authorise selling that asymmetry for a 2% annualised yield.
Three regimes where it is defensible
A documented partial-sell decision. If the board has already decided to reduce the BTC position at a specified level, a covered call struck at that level converts the sell decision into a structured one with a premium attached. The call is not a yield trade; it is an execution mechanism.
A defined-risk income programme against a buffer. A treasury with a liquidity buffer it is willing to put at risk can write covered calls against a defined notional smaller than the full reserve, with the maximum loss bounded to the buffer. The sizing must be against the buffer, not against the reserve, and the strike must be far enough out that the probability-weighted loss is acceptable at programme inception.
A confirmed, written regime assessment. If the board has made a documented judgment that the near-term upside is bounded and the regime has shifted, a time-limited covered call programme may be appropriate. This is a high bar: a written regime assessment, a defined expiry, and a pre-authorised exit ramp if spot approaches the strike.
The alternative
If the board wants premium income without surrendering the full upside, the correct instrument is a short put on a notional smaller than the reserve, struck at a level the treasury would be willing to acquire additional BTC at. The premium is lower than a covered call on the same notional, but the existing reserve retains full participation in any upside move. The trade is a bet on the put strike holding, not a sale of the asset's best outcome.
Practice
How we build this architecture for a public-company treasury →
Engagement
Request capacity for an introductory diligence call →
For general informational purposes only. Not investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice, and not an offer or solicitation. Derivatives, digital assets, and overlay strategies involve substantial risk, including the risk of total loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results.